Canon is a Japanese company. If you're talking about adapters, then I'd argue that you're moving the camera towards a level of complexity that this camera's not really about. In terms of the camcorder, I was won over by the XC10, despite its flaws. Bought a Panasonic HC X1000 E. Better picture,better lens and cheap as chips to run on SD cards. Thus I would provide a better images than colleagues using smaller ooc jpg and I should hope for more viewers. So i was hoping you could tell me if the x10 is close to the mark3 in noise at around 3200 to 6400 iso, or if it is much worse, or equal ? All Panasonic need to do is a put a twisty hand grip on the GH4 and give it a ridiculously over the top bit rate to appease ignorant broadcasters who think bit rate and IQ are inseparable and they'd have themselves an XC10 killer with RAW photos and interchangeable lenses. I like the RX10 II mainly for stills and HFR slow motion video. The Canon XC10 4K Camcorder features the Canon Log gamma setting that sets the camera to maximize dynamic range and provide a wide exposure latitude. Hybrid cameras are those capable of capturing both high-quality stills and video. so what other camcorder does better with less money? also .. do you care at a AV100 sony 4K camcorder that also has stills capability doesn't shoot RAW either? all of them are much heavier and larger than the XC10. That doesn't speak well for their product development or marketing teams. So Canon XC10, while being a cheaper option, tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than the $1693 Canon XA15, as seen on the chart below. Even you state that it's a "novel experiment" and Canon just "threw out there". The lens, with a 35mm-equivalent of 25.5-105mm, will be available in mid-January for $799. The big problem with this camera is that that it's neither here nor there, neither fish nor fowl. The Canon R is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera, while the XC10 is a fixed lens compact. The quality of the jpgs from this camera is lagging behind many mobile phones. Or is it that your photo's are crap without a bit of post-processing? No. Sony PXW-X70... $2000 + 4k upgrade. This one fits the bill. First rule of all major review sites. The XC10 records much more data and theoretically provides much more malleable files for postproduction. +EVs simply raise the ISO and introduces more noise, I'm afraid. Because if you had seen, held, or used one, you would've had something actually useful to say about Canon's hybrid camcorder instead of trying to bash me for commenting on my real world hands on experience with this camera. Let's get into the flamewar! In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. The video quality wasn't there, the ergonomics wasn't there, and the value wasn't there. Read more, Canon's new XC10 is the first product we've seen which is neither a stills camera with a video feature or a video camera that can capture stills. the EVF? It has great ergonomics for handheld shooting, is built around a 1"-type sensor, and includes the ability to record Canon Log, providing up to 12 stops of dynamic range. The 24mm F3.5, 35mm F2 and 65mm F2 DG DN share similar designs and have weather-sealed metal bodies. Every criticism, no matter how well supported our argument is, is subject to intense scrutiny by commenters and forum posters. The ISO options range from 160 to a pretty gobsmacking 20,000, although anything above 2,000 starts to get quite noisy since this is essentially video gain. Canon has released its XC10 digital camcorder which combines advanced 4K video recording with capable still shooting features. For that price you can get the Sony RX10m2 or 3 and have a bag of cash left over. I too apologize and agree with your regarding social media and still images - many bloggers even use 900x600 as a standard. at least it looks like a pro video camera. the Panasonic AG-DVX200 looks great .. doesn't it? However, it’s a rather different beast compared to other members of the Cinema EOS range, such as the C100. It's a frankencamera. I totally agree! Yes, it is a rather throw-away product. And by the way, the 300 Mb codec in XC-10 is an inefficient intra frame, nowhere near as good as an IPB 100 Mb/sec h.264 codec. Despite its crossover aims, the XC10 is still clearly more camcorder than digital camera.That said, the lens in question is very good. How the h3ll can dpreview give it an 80%? ).But, first and foremost, it's the exact opposite of the 80D: a camera designed in the worst way possible, trying to hit an impossible number of requirements with stringent limitations put into place. so what social media platform could care less about 12mp? I didn't hear anything about high end Vixias being discontinued, and the brand new (underwhelming) G40s just shipped. Just because you can think of a mechanism for pressure to be applied to us doesn't mean that it happens or that we wouldn't push back vehemently. Stuck at home with the grand-babies. Have a look at our initial sample gallery taken on a full-frame Sony body. The truth is a fixed lens camera with a slow zoom won't appeal to a huge number of people, but who knows? YOu know .. the ones that offer 200+ Mbps h.264 with 4:2:2 internal recording? What’s the best camera for around $2000? A detailed hands-on review and field test of the Canon XC10 camera, with extensive demonstrations, example photos and 4K video. Does Adobe Premiere Elements, or iMovie, for example, work directly with these files. Not even 60 fps on 4K ... Dead on arrival... not doing 60 fps in 4k isn;t a big deal as it's competitors (that still wipe it off the map for 1/3rd to half the price) don;t have 4k at 60 fps either. Or better yet, 12 Bit Raw at today's average DSLR pricing! Broadcasters don't think iq and bit rate are inseparable.... Broadcasters, in general, are always looking for the most 'acceptable' compromise in compression vs low latency/high quality footage for mastering. For monitoring, the camera features a touchscreen with Vari-Angle LCD monitor and an included loupe to mount to the LCD for viewing in bright environments. It may have an innovative grip, but that's it. An interesting camera I'd consider for the next big adventure. So the ISO abilities aren’t quite up there with Super 35-equipped Cinema EOS cameras, which can shoot clean footage at as high as 3,200 or even 6,400 ISO. When the files are soft, lacking dynamic range, and don't grade easily, any extra lack of motion artifacts of tonality from the colour space become moot. Good experiment, but it will need the new Canon tech to be more convincing... My take. It is achieved by recording a video at a higher frame-rate than the standard playback rate of 24fps or 30fps. Plenty of people have re-encoded video just to put it above the 50mbps threshold many broadcasters have for 1080p and it has been accepted. I'm not saying that this is saving xc10 performance, just to point it out. Chris and Jordan from DPReview TV also shot a gallery with the lens, but on Panasonic bodies. What leaps out at me isn't poor image quality I can tell you. This is something that could potentially put off many folk, especially since compact system cameras such as the Sony A7S provide 4K video and interchangeable lenses for similar money â although the excellent Sony A7R II costs significantly more. Currently thereâs a new movement of citizen journalists creating compelling video reports that are seen by a global audience 24/7. If it does it's well and good but even if it doesn't it's still a valuable indicator or pathfinder for future products. They looked like badly sharpened 1080P files. Given last vixia was retailing at 1300. For a start, it’s price of a little over Â£1,500 puts it much closer to consumer-grade camcorders. As far as the endlessly paraded 'broadcast approved' spec, data rates seem to weigh a disproportionate amount. Aiming in news market and various semi pro segments justifies its price as a handy tool. Could this be the camcorder-DSLR crossover we’ve been waiting for? The XC10 is an all-in-one compact hybrid … But I would be very wary of arguing that the GH4 produces better 4K files. On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Canon XC10 is a more popular camera, based on its 20+ reviews… That's about it. Without 60p everything with fast movements looks too blurry for me. However, all three can be assigned different functions, with quite a range of options available. While Canon are justifiably crucified by DPR readers, the main appeal of most Canon products is usability and reliability, rather than bleeding edge technology. Find out if it'll make your life easier in our detailed review.
What Is Ba Degree, Benchmade Sailing Knife, Types Of Marriages In Africa, Incident Response Team Model, Harman Kardon Sb20 Vs Sb26, Hno4 Oxidation Number, Early Childhood Education Courses In Canada For International Students, Gerber Sheath Replacement, Picture Of Chiller, Alienware Aw558 Review,