Success and survival rates of endosseous implants are well-documented in a number of controlled clinical trials and systematic reviews [1,2,3].Generally, controlled trials evaluate endosseous implants in specific clinical situations; thus, the patient population is subjected to rigorous inclusion criteria and follow-up. Papaspyridakos P, Chen C-J, Singh M, Weber H-P, Gallucci GO. Criteria to determine survival and success of dental implants have been reported in several studies. Purpose: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate whether implant roughness is associated with periimplantitis in humans. dentistry. 2012;91:242–248. Forty-three patients were diagnosed with dental aplasia and treated with dental impla… Department of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden. Key Findings. Genco RJ. Most frequently reported criteria for success at the implant level were mobility, pain, radiolucency, and peri-implant bone loss (> 1.5 mm), and for success at the peri-implant soft-tissue level, suppuration, and bleeding.  |  Materials and Methods: An electronic search of 3 databases (MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library) was undertaken until October 2017 and was supplemented by manual searching. 1986 Summer;1(1):11–25. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Nurul Syamimi binti Mohd Azlan Sunil, Dr. Ashok, Dr. Dhanraj. The criteria for success at the prosthetic level were the occurrence of technical complications/prosthetic maintenance, adequate function, and esthetics during the five-year period… Particular attention was given to the cause of immunosuppression and the subsequent influence on implant survival to provide clinical evidence for prospective therapy … A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the success rate of dental implants placed in the incisive canal region and the complications related to this procedure. Surgical experience influences 2-stage implant osseointegration. Zoghbi SA, de Lima LA, Saraiva L, Romito GA. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants, Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. National Center for Biotechnology Information, Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. 2011 Nov;22(6):2327-31. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318232a706. Please read and accept the terms and conditions and check the box to generate a sharing link. DOI: 10.1177/0022034511431252. Search strategy A search strategy was conducted using Pubmed, Ovid Medline and Cochrane Central databases using A methodical search of PubMed of the US National Library of Medicine and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted for applicable articles. Criteria for Success in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review Author: International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) Subject: www.ijsr.net Keywords: ijsr, International Journal of Science and Research, ijsr.net, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), www.ijsr.net Created Date: … Criteria for Success in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review @inproceedings{Sunil2017CriteriaFS, title={Criteria for Success in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review}, author={Nurul Syamimi binti Mohd Azlan Sunil and D. Ashok and D. Dhanraj}, year={2017} } Hirota M, Ozawa T, Iwai T, Mitsudo K, Ogawa T. J Clin Med. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. J Dent Res. Current view of risk factors for periodontal diseases. Success in implant dentistry should ideally evaluate a long-term primary outcome of an implant-prosthetic complex as a whole. ... review was specifically designed to investigate whether there were any methodological weaknesses in the current systematic reviews on 10-year implant ... A. Albrektsson, T. Zarb, G. Worthington, P. ErikssonThe long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants : a review and proposed criteria of success. 2018 Jul ... after further review, 28 articles were finally included for this systematic review. Suppuration and probing depth are the frequently used criteria at peri-implant soft tissue level. Abstract . Dental Implant Failure Rate and Marginal Bone Loss in Smokers Compared to Non-Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Abstract Background:Although dental implant therapy is considered a predictable treatment modality with reported high survival and success rates, biological complications do occur, and a number of risk factors have been Implants are widely used to support dental prostheses, consistent with their overall high survival rate.1, 2 Nevertheless, the high survival rate of implants has hampered efforts to identify specific risk factors for implant failures. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. Pain, mobility and bone loss are the most commonly used criteria to report success at the implant level. 2009;20(2):14. Fourteen studies related success rates. Further, the review addresses how available success criteria were used within the studies. Success Criteria in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review. NIH 2020 Oct 27;56(11):564. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110564. Success Criteria in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review. P. Papaspyridakos, C.-J. Recent systematic reviews concluded that clinical evidences are enough to support the vertical and horizontal bone reconstruction of the alveolar ridge for insertion of dental implants. Primary outcomes in this systematic review included (1) survival rate (defined as implant present in the oral cavity independent of biological or technical complications), (2) success rate (defined as implants free of all complications); and (3) marginal bone loss. Most frequently reported criteria for success at the implant level were mobility, pain, radiolucency, and peri-implant bone loss (> 1.5 mm), and for success at the peri-implant soft-tissue level, suppuration, and bleeding. It is the most commonly occurring dental anomaly during tooth development. COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation. 5 Schmitz JP. Sign in here to access free tools such as favourites and alerts, or to access personal subscriptions, If you have access to journal content via a university, library or employer, sign in here, Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. searched include: ‘implant success. Only studies conducted with roughened surface implants and at least five-year follow-up were included. 2020 Aug 24;9(9):2733. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092733. I: Clinical and radiographic results, Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Access to society journal content varies across our titles. Surgical Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review Ali Tahmaseb, DDS, PhD1/Daniel Wismeijer, DDS, PhD 2/Wim Coucke, MStat, PhD3/Wiebe Derksen, DDS4 Purpose: To assess the literature on the accuracy and clinical performance of static computer-assisted implant surgery in implant dentistry. Please check you selected the correct society from the list and entered the user name and password you use to log in to your society website. HHS For more information view the SAGE Journals Sharing page. Consequently, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare treatment results of implant dentistry in immunocompromised patients with them in not immunocompromised patients. 2016; 3(2): 555610. Chen, M. Singh, H.-P. Weber, and G.O. Three articles presented a sample size of 20 patients. • Outcome: implant success and survival. An electronic MEDLINE/PubMED search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials and prospective studies reporting on outcomes of implant dentistry. This site uses cookies. The criteria at patient satisfaction level were discomfort and paresthesia, satisfaction with appearance, and ability to chew/taste. Journal of Dentistry. de Mello JS(1), Faot F(1), Correa G(1), Chagas Júnior OL(2). Prosthetic platforms in implant dentistry. Long-Term Efficacy of Variable-Thread Tapered Implants-A Retrospective, Clinical and Radiological Evaluation. Hwang D, Wang HL. J Periodontol. Systematic Review on Success of. Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible. J Dent Res. An electronic MEDLINE/PubMED search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials and prospective studies reporting on outcomes of implant dentistry. I have read and accept the terms and conditions, View permissions information for this article. Explicit protocol driven study selection, data extraction and data synthesis methods to reduce potential risk of bias in … A photographic study. criteria ’, ‘ implant survival rates ’, and‘implant dentistry. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Department of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden . Replacing a single tooth in the anterior maxilla is one of the greatest challenges in dentistry. AIM AND OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine the most frequently used criteria to define treatment success in implant dentistry. Single implants in the esthetic zone: analysis of recent peri-implant soft tissue alterations and patient satisfaction. Á Â À Ç 4 01 0///235 1050,0011 Citation: Beltrami R, Sfondrini F, Confalonieri L, Carbone L, Bernardinelli L (2015) Miniscrews and Mini-Implants Success Rates in Orthodontic Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Several Clinical Parameters. A systematic review. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the implant survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL) and biological complications of dental implants in SS patients. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. An electronic MEDLINE/PubMED search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials and prospective studies reporting on outcomes of implant dentistry. In this review, we were particularly interested in assessing the risk associated with 2 implant-related factors, that is, implant length (analyzed in 6 studies) and implant diameter (4 studies) and 2 patient-related factors, that is, smoking habit (6 studies) and the location of the implant (6 studies). Success criteria for dental implants were proposed by Albrektsson et al in the 1980s and while osseointegration remains a predominant marker a range of other parameters have been introduced over the years. Usefulness of the aesthetic result as a success criterion for implant therapy: a review. The e-mail addresses that you supply to use this service will not be used for any other purpose without your consent. Success in implant dentistry should ideally evaluate a long-term primary outcome of an implant-prosthetic complex as a whole. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior1*, Claudia Cristina Biguetti2, Mariza Akemi Matsumoto2 Guilherme Abu Halawa Kudo1, Raquel Barroso Parra da Silva2, Patrícia Pinto Saraiva1, Walid D. Fakhouri3,4* 1Pró–Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação (PRPPG), Universidade do Sagrado Coração, The purpose of this review was to test the null hypothesis of no difference in marginal bone loss and implant failure rates between smokers and non-smokers with respect to the follow-up period. Only studies conducted with roughened surface implants and at least five-year follow-up were included. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. The Impact of Bisphosphonate Therapy Upon Oral Implant Treatment; A Systematic Review. IADR members have access to this journal as part of their membership. Taking into consideration the disparate outcome measures employed to assess dental implant performance and within the limitations of this systematic review, we may affirm that osseointegrated implants are safe and present high survival rates and minimal marginal bone resorption in the long term. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the success rate of dental implants placed in the incisive canal region and the complications related to this procedure. Purpose of the Review. 1 Can Genetic Factors Compromise the Success of Dental Implants? M. Le. Updates on ultrasound research in implant dentistry: a systematic review of potential clinical indications Dentomaxillofac Radiol . To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access. The clinical success of tooth‐ and implant‐supported zirconia‐based fixed dental prostheses. The aim was to compare fully digitalized workflows to conventional and/or mixed analog-digital workflows for the treatment with tooth-borne or implant-supported fixed reconstructions. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. Á Â À Ç 4 01 0///235 1050,0011 Citation: Beltrami R, Sfondrini F, Confalonieri L, Carbone L, Bernardinelli L (2015) Miniscrews and Mini-Implants Success Rates in Orthodontic Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Several Clinical Parameters. To undertake a systematic review of the literature on the long term results (≥5 years) of implants placed in maxillofacial areas grafted with any type of osseous block‐grafts in two‐stage surgeries. The aim of this review was to was to examine the most frequently used criteria to define treatment success in implant dentistry. Purpose: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate whether implant roughness is associated with periimplantitis in humans. Epub 2009 Aug 6. Updates on ultrasound research in implant dentistry: a systematic review of potential clinical indications 1Vaishnavi Bhaskar, ... and treatment success.18,19 Cross-sectional imaging that can be repeatedly used to monitor marginal bone level after implants are in function is, therefore, much needed. By continuing to browse Get the latest research from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus. Some society journals require you to create a personal profile, then activate your society account, You are adding the following journals to your email alerts, Did you struggle to get access to this article? As for prosthetic level, the commonly used criteria include function and esthetics while patient’s satisfaction … Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on download. Corpus ID: 32982999. 2015:242–8. Only one of the nine studies did not present well-defined success criteria. The continuous development in dental processing ensures new opportunities in the field of fixed prosthodontics in a complete virtual environment without any physical model situations. Systematic review of … 2012 Mar;14(1):3-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00234.x. The criteria at patient satisfaction level were dis- comfort and paresthesia, satisfaction with appear- ance, and ability to chew/taste. Criteria for Success in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review. The purpose of this study was to examine the most frequently used criteria to define treatment success in implant dentistry. The implant should have no mobility and demonstrate no radiolucent areas radiographically, annual vertical bone loss after the first year should be less than 0.2 mm, and there should be no persistent and/or irreversible symptoms. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):578-86. 7,25 The autogenous grafts are still considered the gold standard for reconstruction, mainly for large defects, and present implant survival rates similar to nongrafted areas. Dental implant restoration for lost molar teeth on one side increased the FIA score by 9.0% (P<0.0001).The MAI score also increased, by 14.3% after implant restoration (P<0.0001).Comparison between the good and poor mastication groups, which were subdivided based on the median MAI score before implant restoration, showed that the FIA score of the poor group was … Digital vs. Freehand Anterior Single-Tooth Implant Restoration. Articles reporting the incisive canal deflation technique or neurovascular bundle lateralization technique, with or without concomitant dental implant … Data were analyzed for success at the implant level, peri-implant soft tissue, prosthetics, and patient satisfaction. Background . In this systematic review, we analyzed whether recommended maximum insertion torque values of 5 to 10 Ncm were associated with higher success rates of orthodontic mini-implants compared with mini-implants inserted with maximum insertion torque values beyond this range. In light of the importance of dental implants and increasing volume of reported research, it is important to conduct a systematic review to determine the outcome measures, the methods used for analysis and the nature and reference groups used in the literature of implant dentistry. Journal of Dental Research, 2011. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. DOI: 10.19080/ADOH.2016.03.555610 004 Advances in Dentistry & Oral Health Table 3: (P.I.C.O.1) Studies that evaluate the success rate of dental implant placement in patients with the history of bisphospshonate (BP) use. One implant failed in each test group in two articles and two implants in the other, causing a drop in the survival rate. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review (published online ahead of print December 8, 2011). 5-8 Based on the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference report, 7 survival represents that the implant is still kept in the mouth Most frequently reported criteria for success at the implant level were mobility, pain, radiolucency, and peri-implant bone loss (> 1.5 mm), and for success at the peri-implant soft-tissue level, suppuration, and bleeding. Data Sources . UV-Mediated Photofunctionalization of Dental Implant: A Seven-Year Results of a Prospective Study. J Dent Res. For more information view the SAGE Journals Article Sharing page. In a systematic review comparing single-tooth implants and restored root canal–treated teeth ... dard of dental care might require the use of stringent success criteria, most available study data have used survival criteria … The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Data were analyzed for success at the implant level, peri-implant soft tissue, prosthetics, and patient satisfaction. Narrow-Diameter Dental Implant Marc. Contact us if you experience any difficulty logging in. This systematic review focuses on specific studies of success and survival rate of implants,therefore, a few inclusion criteria were … Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov. Part I: Single crowns, A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss, A 10-year follow-up study of titanium dioxide-blasted implants, Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched implants: a randomized-controlled double-blind split-mouth study. G C A T genes T A C G G C A T Review Can Genetic Factors Compromise the Success of Dental Implants? Author information: (1)Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Search for more papers by this author. Members of _ can log in with their society credentials below. The protocol of this review was based primarily on the PRISMA … Materials and methods. Criteria for Success in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review. Academy News. Data were analyzed for success at the implant level, peri-implant soft tissue, prosthetics, and patient satisfaction. Sharing links are not available for this article. Both functional and aesthetic results are to be strictly pursued. Reported survival rates ranged from 94.7% to 100% and success rates from 94.7% to 100%. If you have access to a journal via a society or association membership, please browse to your society journal, select an article to view, and follow the instructions in this box. The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to analyze the survival and success rates of dental implants placed in hypodontic patients, rated with different criteria.Methods. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review Focusing on Guidelines, Indications, and Radiation Dose Risks Michael M. Bornstein, PD Dr Med Dent 1/William C. Scarfe, BDS, FRACDS, MS 2/ Vida M. Vaughn3/Reinhilde Jacobs, DDS, MSc, PhD, Dr hc 4 MATERIALS AND METHOD An electronic search in the MEDLINE/PubMED database was performed for studies published in English from … The aim of this systematic review is to examine the most frequently used criteria to define treatment success in implant dentistry. Böse MWH, Hildebrand D, Beuer F, Wesemann C, Schwerdtner P, Pieralli S, Spies BC. Trabeculae microstructure parameters serve as effective predictors for marginal bone loss of dental implant in the mandible. Adv Dent & Oral Health. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the implant survival rate, marginal bone loss and biological complications of dental implants in SS patients. This systematic review focuses on specific studies of success and survival rate of implants,therefore, a few inclusion criteria were … Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants, Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading: a 3- to 8-year prospective study on 328 implants, Comparative analysis of immediate functional loading and immediate nonfunctional loading to traditional healing periods: a 5-year follow-up of 550 dental implants, Five- to six-year results of a prospective clinical trial using the ENDOPORE dental implant and a mandibular overdenture, Comparison of dental implant systems: quality of clinical evidence and prediction of 5-year survival, Five-year results from a randomized, controlled trial on early and delayed loading of implants supporting full-arch prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla, Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score, Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible, Loading protocols for dental implants in edentulous patients, Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading, A 5-year prospective study of single-tooth replacements supported by the Astra Tech implant: a pilot study, A conceptual framework for understanding outcomes of oral implant therapy, Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla, Patient self-reported satisfaction with maxillary anterior dental implant treatment, Marginal bone loss with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols and attachment systems: 10-year outcomes, A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues—the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index, Clinical evaluation and prosthetic complications of single tooth replacements by non-submerged implants, Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference, Immediate provisional restoration of screw-type implants in the posterior mandible: results after 5 years of clinical function, A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Most frequently reported criteria for success at the implant level were mobility, pain, radiolucency, and peri-implant bone loss (> 1.5 mm), and for success at the peri-implant soft-tissue level, suppuration, and bleeding. A Systematic Review of Outcome Measurements and Quality of Studies Evaluating Fixed Tooth-Supported Restorations Devangkumar Rajnikant Patel, BDS, MJDF RCS (Eng), MSc Cons Dent, 1Tim O’Brien, BDS, M Clin Dent, Aviva Petrie, MSc, PhD,2 & Haralampos Petridis, DDS, MSc, PhD1 1Prosthodontics Unit, Department of Restorative Dentistry, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK SyStematic Review Updates on ultrasound research in implant dentistry: a systematic review of potential clinical indications 1Vaishnavi Bhaskar, 2Hsun-Liang Chan, 3Mark MacEachern and 4,5Oliver D Kripfgans 1University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 2Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University 1996;67(Suppl 10):1041–1049. Create a link to share a read only version of this article with your colleagues and friends. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients, Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series. Criteria for Success in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review @inproceedings{Sunil2017CriteriaFS, title={Criteria for Success in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review}, author={Nurul Syamimi binti Mohd Azlan Sunil and Dr. Ashok and Dr. Dhanraj}, year={2017} } outcome ’.The search 1980 until October 2010. The criteria for success at the prosthetic level were the occurrence of technical complications/prosthetic maintenance, adequate function, and esthetics during the five-year period. 2012;91:242–248. Corpus ID: 32982999.  |  Treatment management of patients with dental aplasia is challenging.Objectives. Hwang D, Wang HL. The purpose of this study was to examine the most frequently used criteria to define treatment success in implant dentistry. Click the button below for the full-text content, 24 hours online access to download content. Clearing the air about managing implant complications in implant surgery (editorial). NLM Materials and Methods: An electronic search of 3 databases (MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library) was undertaken until October 2017 and was supplemented by manual searching. Only studies conducted with roughened surface implants and at least five-year follow-up were included. Gallucci GO, Doughtie CB, Hwang JW, Fiorellini JP, Weber HP. All types of study designs involving the use of ultrasound imaging in implant dentistry were considered for inclusion, with no limitations based on age, gender, clinical setting (private practice vs educational institution or geographic location). Retention of zirconia crowns to Ti-base abutments: effect of luting pr... Prosthodontic Principles in Dental Implantology, Albrektsson, T, Zarb, G, Worthington, P, Eriksson, AR (, Annibali, S, Bignozzi, I, La Monaca, G, Cristalli, MP (, Astrand, P, Engquist, B, Dahlgren, S, Grondahl, K, Engquist, E, Feldmann, H (, Belser, UC, Grutter, L, Vailati, F, Bornstein, MM, Weber, HP, Buser, D (, Blanes, RJ, Bernard, JP, Blanes, ZM, Belser, UC (, Bornstein, MM, Schmid, B, Belser, UC, Lussi, A, Buser, D (, Buser, D, Mericske-Stern, R, Bernard, JP, Behneke, A, Behneke, N, Hirt, HP. Dental aplasia is an anomaly in which the number of teeth is reduced. criteria ’, ‘ implant survival rates ’, and‘implant dentistry. O. Klein, PD Dr Med, Dr Med Dent/ Eik Shciegnitz, Dr, Med/ Bilal Al-Nawas, Prof Dr Med, Dr Med Dent OBJECTIVE To determine the survival and success rates of narrow-diameter dental implants (NDI) in different clinical indications compared to standard diameter implants. Further, the review addresses how available success criteria were used within the studies. Results. This systematic review was specifically designed to investigate whether there were any methodological weaknesses in the current systematic reviews on 10-year implant survival that may influence the summary estimate and its effect on real world clinical decision making. Replacing a single tooth in the anterior maxilla is one of the greatest challenges in dentistry. S164 Moy et al Single implants in dorsal areas – A systematic review Eur J Oral Implantol 2016;9(Suppl1):S163–S172 • Comparison: no comparison required/delayed implant placement.

Demarini Cf Batting Gloves, Evolution Of Popular Music, The Crossing At Auburn Hills, Bdo Archer Awakening Quest, Freshwater Snails Ontario, Benchmade Bugout Red, Real Estate Agents In Stockholm Sweden, Senior Marketing Executive Salary Singapore, Westland Sulphate Of Iron, Psalm 103:1-5 Niv,

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *